tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34869425.post8500080280750264651..comments2008-11-06T22:58:05.787-05:00<em>TVF</em> Editorial Boardnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34869425.post-33772255516343533002008-11-06T22:58:05.787-05:002008-11-06T22:58:05.787-05:00We appreciate the comments. Mr. Weintraub suggests that we have misinterpreted Mr. Obama's interview remarks, but presents no evidence to support his claim. Describing the Warren court as failing to break free from the essential constraints in the constitution, suggests a view of the constitution as irrelevant and and obstacle to be overcome. This correspondent then retains the position that this expressed view is inconsistent with a mandate to uphold, protect and defend.Cominiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05402835208295923171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34869425.post-48627967300407858432008-11-06T10:11:04.516-05:002008-11-06T10:11:04.516-05:00Really reaching for the bottom of the barrel, aren't you? If you have any genuine interest in this topic, you can easily find the entire transcript. You will then see that what President-elect Obama actually said is precisely the opposite of what you suggest here.<BR/><BR/>How ridiculous.David Weintraubhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03734350480482539327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34869425.post-44335945076848880892008-11-06T07:39:59.090-05:002008-11-06T07:39:59.090-05:00...uphold the Constitution and the Constitutional processes for changing it...<BR/><BR/>you guys need to find something to do with your brains because right now.. they are experiencing smoke from logic wiring problems.<BR/><BR/>sour grapes is taking some seriously aberrant paths...hereLarry Ghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02282254026681944326noreply@blogger.com